CanadianDC5
04-25-2005, 02:59 PM
Hey Everyone,
Thought I'd post my dyno numbers along with a few of the other cars that dynoed too. This was on a Mustang dyno which here in Calgary reads 13% lower then a dynojet. So I've posted the mustang #'s and also converted them to approx. dynojet #'s.
My car 2002 RSX 135.2whp/124.3wtq x13% to dynojet 153whp/140.7wtq
2000 GSR 128whp/96wtq x13% to dynojet 144.6whp/108.5wtq
2000 ITR 146whp/103wtq x13% to dynojet 165whp/116.4wtq
2003 Type S 169whp/122wtq x13% to dynojet 191whp/138wtq
I was amazed to see that I pulled more power then the GSR and only 12whp less then the ITR. And my car is a torque monster compared to the GSR and ITR.
GSR has SRI, 4-1 header, exhaust
ITR was stock
Type S has CAI, IMG, DCRH, Exhaust, K-Pro
My car has CAI, IMG, TB coolant bypass, PCV filter(same idea as oil catch can), shorty header, testpipe, ground kit, exhaust, apexi s-afc2.
I was hoping for 155+whp but no big deal. I still have pulleys to install so that should put me up over 155whp.
Thought I'd post my dyno numbers along with a few of the other cars that dynoed too. This was on a Mustang dyno which here in Calgary reads 13% lower then a dynojet. So I've posted the mustang #'s and also converted them to approx. dynojet #'s.
My car 2002 RSX 135.2whp/124.3wtq x13% to dynojet 153whp/140.7wtq
2000 GSR 128whp/96wtq x13% to dynojet 144.6whp/108.5wtq
2000 ITR 146whp/103wtq x13% to dynojet 165whp/116.4wtq
2003 Type S 169whp/122wtq x13% to dynojet 191whp/138wtq
I was amazed to see that I pulled more power then the GSR and only 12whp less then the ITR. And my car is a torque monster compared to the GSR and ITR.
GSR has SRI, 4-1 header, exhaust
ITR was stock
Type S has CAI, IMG, DCRH, Exhaust, K-Pro
My car has CAI, IMG, TB coolant bypass, PCV filter(same idea as oil catch can), shorty header, testpipe, ground kit, exhaust, apexi s-afc2.
I was hoping for 155+whp but no big deal. I still have pulleys to install so that should put me up over 155whp.